Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: is Islamo Fascism a good way to discribe these infidel hoardes?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Date:
is Islamo Fascism a good way to discribe these infidel hoardes?



is islamo Fascism a good way to discribe these infidel hoardes? doesnt it actually confuse the discusion by combining a western political phenomenon with something totaly opposed to the west its culture its history its people its religion? i dont at the moment have another term to propose other then saracen bastards but thats to crude and to grounded in catholic history. i find using the term islamo fascism only makes it more dificult for me when i engage people in discussing al qeada or islam. as a whole i like mohomadesim as it really enrages them when you say it. but i only use it to illustrate a point. i just want to be as clear as possible. does the CFPA actually have a position on this meaning terminology?
may i propose Santiago De Matamoros as a patron siant?
ever yours
towards a Christian Falangist Canada! Christian Strong and Free

Attachments
__________________
De Profundis Clamavi Ad Te Domine
Anonymous

Date:

Interesting site.

Islamo-Fascism is a term of rhetoric, true. And I take your point it takes a Western (already muddy) socio-political label and applies it in such a way that clears nothing up. But in my opinion, it does provide an explanation, albeit superficially, to the common man. Islam is Totalitarian and authoritarian, and ultimately despotic as Dar Al-Islam is supposed to be led/governed by a Fuhrer ie The Caliph, over the Islamic Reich ie the Caliphate aka Dar Al-Islam (The realm/domain of Islam). Islam was clearly the model for Germans even though they said they were following the Roman model for National Socialism. Even their form of Racism (elitism and exclusivity), Anti-Semitism, and Anti-Christianity was imparted to National Socialist.  I think more than anything Islamo-fascism is a code-word used to for the common man (or woman), to bringing their established presumptions to the table, for instant understanding (without much fore or after thought) for what is being talked about IMO that is an Islamic based totalitarianism opposed to liberal democratic values, and self determination.   Most on the left purposely abuse the term, Fascist and fascism in order to try and confuse the fact that the fathers of fascism were leftist populists, but in this context I think the term fits.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

To anyone who has seriously studied the matter, the term "Islamic" should be enough to send chills down your spine, but to the ignorant masses who rely on CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, USA Today or their local fishwrap for their understanding of the world, the modifier "Fascism" needs to be applied in order to give an approximation of the reality of the phenomenon we are facing.

It's sort of an antidote to the term "Radical" Islamist, which is just a term of obfuscation used to plant the idea of "good" musliims vs. all those "bad" muslims. Which is obviously a false and pernicious idea, promoted by the limp-wristed libs in society who have been inculcated with politically (BS) correct multi-culti-ism in Junior College.

Unfortunately, it will take time until the obvious truth is accepted as self-evident.

The truth usually goes through three stages of acceptance.

First, it is scoffed at as ridiculous. (Islam is a Religion/Religions are Good/ergo: Islam is Good, duuuuh. . .)

Second it is vehemently denied and the opposite assertion is defended (All muslims aren't those "bad" ones, only the "radical" ones who have "hijacked a great religion" blah, blah, blah)

Third, it is accepted as self-evidently true. That's where we're headed.

__________________
Martel / DTI


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:

Agreed.

I was a prospective convert to Islam in my youth, because of a dear friend who was Muslim.

But the more I learned, the more disturbed I became, and when I began to ask questions and have criticisms, the spirit of Islam reered its ugly head, and I was chastized for being brain washed by the American/Western Media (even though I pointed things out in black and white dirrectly from the "Mein" Koran). 

Enlightened Westerners must work to have Islam reclasified as a political entity/organization(s) - especially those pushing political agendas to establish the Islamic constitution "Sharia" above the indigenous constitutions and civil liberties.

(I believe int eh divinly inspired origin of the declaration of independance, the constitution and the bill of rights - stricly from my own interpretation and exegesis of the creation stories in the book of Genesis)

Islam, like National Socialism (who got most if not all its ques from islam) is a socia-political ideology, that hides under the guise of faith and religion.

We (enlightened westerners) can't be petty, ammaturish, or immature in our countering it, where ever it takes root. 

We must be rational, tempered and philosophical in our responses and appeal to the natural inherent truth and good that exists in the human heart (Duet. 30:14)

Islam is said (although the evidence shows otherwise) to be the fastest growing religion in the world, it is also the religion with the most defections each year. 

I like many of the ideas and beleifs of this platform, except for a few, I will state/discuss those in the appropriate thread.

__________________
Mortaryan


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:

I wouldn't count on Islam getting reclassified as a political anything. It was already reclassified after 9/11 to religion of peace and anyone who says other wise is classified a racist. What surprises me though (in this crazy mixed up world) is that the national socialists haven't tried to become a religion so that they could get the same respect that governments give Islam and maybe they too could be reclassified as a religion of peace.

__________________
Death To Islam!


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:

The CFPA has stated for a long time that "the only good Muslim is a bad Moslem" which is contrary to what the MSM (main stream media) proclaims which is the good Muslims (follows the koran) are the bad muslims. Using that logic Muhammad would a bad Muslim (radical). So if Muhammad is a bad (radical) Muslim then what the heck does that make Islam?

__________________
Death To Islam!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

If the poison of Islam is ever to be countered in a serious way, It will have to be "reclassified" as it's being called. The seditious, criminal, gangster-ish element within it can never be excised without it destroying itself completely.

Now, I'm all for Islam destroying itself, but what I'm saying is that the memeset "Islam" is all about survival and propagating itself and will never be modified into a less pernicious form. It is a spiritual disease, like rabies of the soul. Violent, inhuman, consuming and un-thinking. It is the antithesis of enlightenment. It is barbarous religious gangsterism.

The problem, as I see it, is that we Westerners have a "blind spot" where it comes to religion. We are conditioned to think of all religious expressions as essentially benign, notwithstanding the fact that most religions (at one time or another) have practiced Human Sacrifice and other such atrocities, and that often the most hateful and anti-human bilge is spouted from religious pulpits.

We in the West need to wake up and see that Islam is indeed an evil. A political monster which seeks to colonize and destroy all other cultures. It is the most violent and retrograde force in history and needs to be taken seriously, and taken at it's word.

And then there's this B.S> about how "it's only a tiny minority of 'bad muslims' who are responsible for Jihad, blah, blah, blah. . ." My answer to this is simple:

It was only a tiny minority of Germans who were members of the Nazi Party, and look at the murder and wreckage they caused. So, did FDR and his advisors say "Well, it's only a tiny minority of Germans causing all of the trouble, let's only kill Nazi's and let the all the rest of them immigrate to America!" Hell no. He declared war and destroyed the "Thousand Year Reich" with all the force he could muster.

Same with the Japanese. A tiny clique of the "Warrior Class" pushed Japan to invade Manchuria, Indochina and the West Pacific. Did the vast majority of Japanese who wanted no part of the rape of Nanking and the conquest of the Phillipines get a pass? Hell no, they got two nukes up the wazoo, and rightly so.

Same with the Communist Party. They were a tiny fraction of the population of the Soviet Union, yet they managed to murder 20 million of their own, not to mention the Chi-Coms who weren't far behind.

So why on earth should all 90% of the muslims who at a minimum passively allow the Jihad to fester, or who actively support it with political support, money and logistics, why should they get a pass? Because some limp-wristed libs in the State Department get the vapors if someone calls them "Racist?" Because the Bush Administration needs to kiss some more Saudi ass for a little cheap oil? Because the MSM and the Fishwraps want to defend thier muzzie butt-buddies?

Why, why, why?

There certainly is no GOOD reason to be found.

How much destruction must they cause? How much more treasure must we spend on homeland security? How much criminal nonsense must we uncover from the moslem fifth column in the West? Will we lose Sweden? the Netherlands? France? We've already given them Kosovo and the Bush Co. is trying like hell to give them the West Bank and Gaza. Will we give them Hackensack New Jersey and Dearborn Michigan as well?

How many more "honor"-murders, how many more polygamist welfare-frauds, how many more college footbaths and "Muslims Only" gymnasium hours and on and on and on with their endless and backwards demands, threats, lawsuits and BULL**** must we endure?

We must wake up and turn the legitimate power of the State against them. Shut down their "mosques" deport them en-masse, close our borders and force them to renounce Islam and convert to Christ. We need a new "Reconquista."

While we're at it, let's take back Constantinople as well.

__________________
Martel / DTI


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:

Right On Martel360. Tell it like it is brother. You are exactly correct about Islam being a cancer of the soul unfortunately that cancer manifests itself into the physical realm causing terror, death and oppression for millions of people. Islam has been our enemy for over 1,000 years and it will remain as such until it dies or Christianity dies. And the Bible says that we will not die. Let "Death To Islam" be our war cry.

__________________
Death To Islam!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

CFPA/DTI

__________________
Martel / DTI


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:

I liked this so much I put it up on the Party Blog at www.phalange.com I could sign it A.J. Ortiz in there too if you don't mind.

__________________
Death To Islam!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

By all means post it, but please keep me anonymous.

Martel / DTI works fine. Many Thanks.

__________________
Martel / DTI


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

Hammer,

The Blog is AWESOME! I LOVE IT! I was semi-pestering the old leadership to start up a blog for a long time.

Are we getting cross-linkage ?

Are we getting ad revenue?

Are we getting unique hits action?

By all means let me know how I can contribute.

__________________
Martel / DTI
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard